17th April 2026
A controversial proposal attributed to Green Party leader Zack Polanski has ignited strong reactions across the political spectrum, after details emerged of a plan to extend Universal Basic Income (UBI) payments to migrants living in the UK. The reported proposal suggests that individuals without settled status, or those residing in the country on non-visitor visas, could receive payments of up to £1,600 per month, with estimates placing the potential annual cost at around £19 billion.
Polanski has described the concept of Universal Basic Income as “simple yet transformative,” arguing that it could provide financial stability, reduce poverty, and streamline welfare systems. Supporters of UBI more broadly say it offers a fairer, less bureaucratic safety net in an increasingly uncertain economy.
However, critics have reacted sharply, particularly to the suggestion that such payments could apply to non-citizens. Opponents argue that extending UBI in this way could place a significant burden on public finances and risk acting as an incentive for increased migration. Some have labelled the proposal unrealistic, especially at a time when many households are facing rising living costs.
Concerns have also been raised about how such a programme would be funded, with sceptics questioning whether taxpayers would ultimately bear the cost during a period of economic strain. The debate highlights a wider divide in UK politics over immigration, welfare, and economic priorities.
While proponents see bold reforms like UBI as necessary to address systemic inequality, critics argue that such policies must be grounded in fiscal and practical realities. As discussions continue, it remains to be seen whether proposals of this scale gain broader political traction or remain part of a more theoretical vision for reform.
